Edward Levin of Gordon Feinblatt LLC contributed the following article on SNDAs, excerpted from a longer article available at this link:
One of the closing documents in a real estate financing transaction when the property is leased is a Subordination, Non-disturbance, and Attornment Agreement (“SNDA”). SNDAs have a number of purposes and uses, and they serve to connect the lender with the tenant.
Basic Provisions of an SNDA
Let’s consider each of the terms in the title of the agreement.
Subject to private agreements (and occasionally equitable principles), priority is typically established by order of creation under the rule: first in time is first in right. If a landowner mortgages its property and then signs a lease covering all or part of it, the mortgage is senior to the lease, and the lease is regarded as subordinate to the mortgage. On the other hand, if the lease were executed before the mortgage, the mortgage would be deemed to be subordinate to the lease.
If one instrument is superior to another, the provisions of the first instrument will control over those of the second to the extent of any conflict. For example, if a fire damages or destroys all or part of the property or if a condemnation takes all or part of it, questions regarding application of insurance or condemnation proceeds (among other issues) would be decided based upon the relative priority of the lease and mortgage. If the lease is prior, the lease provisions will control. These may mandate that the landlord use insurance proceeds to rebuild the premises. In contrast, if the mortgage is first, the mortgagee would be entitled to take all of the insurance proceeds and use them to reduce the debt, if the mortgage so provides.
A lender typically wants to use an SNDA if in the absence of such an agreement the lease would be prior to the mortgage. In order to ensure that the terms of the mortgage will govern, the lender will insist that its borrower (which is also the landowner and the landlord) and the tenant enter into an SNDA with the lender.
Another effect of characterization of one instrument as being subordinate to another may be even more dramatic than the issue of what clause controls in particular circumstances. The general principle is that the termination of a senior instrument will terminate all instruments that are junior to it and controlled by it. Therefore, if a mortgage is senior to a lease, the foreclosure of the mortgage will terminate the lease, unless there is an agreement that provides otherwise. However, if the lease is senior to the mortgage, the foreclosure of the mortgage will not affect the lease – other than to place a new party in the role of landlord.
As suggested above, the subordination of the lease to the mortgage could have disastrous consequences to the tenant – the lease could be terminated if the mortgage were foreclosed. Therefore, subordination of its lease, by itself, would be unacceptable to a tenant. To avoid the lease’s being put in peril of its existence, in the non-disturbance part of the SNDA the lender agrees that if it forecloses on the property or if the property is transferred by a deed in lieu of foreclosure, the lease will continue. Under either of these situations, with a non-disturbance clause the tenant remains in possession of the property and the new owner of the property (whether it be the purchaser at a foreclosure sale or the transferee of a deed in lieu of foreclosure) becomes the successor landlord.
The non-disturbance right under an SNDA is typically premised on the tenant’s being in compliance with the terms of its lease.
The credit of the tenant is often a basis for the underwriting of the loan, and the lender typically wants the lease to continue even after a foreclosure sale or a transfer in lieu of foreclosure. Section 7-105.6(c) of the Real Property Article of the Maryland Code enables lenders to choose which subordinate leases they want to continue after the sale by stating in the advertisement for the foreclosure sale which will survive. By virtue of an amendment to the predecessor of this section in 1985 sponsored by the Real Property Section of the Maryland State Bar Association, lenders have the right to make this election even if the mortgage does not have a provision about it.
The final term in the name of an SNDA is “attornment” which is the act by the current tenant agreeing to become the tenant of the holder of the remainder or reversionary estate. (The word “attornment” has the same root as “attorney” which literally means one who is appointed to act in place of another.) Under the attornment provisions of an SNDA, the current tenant agrees to be bound by all of the terms of the lease to any person or party to whom the remainder or reversion is transferred by reason of foreclosure of or other proceedings brought pursuant to or under the loan documents. These provisions are supplemented by §8-101 of the Real Property Article of the Maryland Code (“RP”), which provides that transferees of the reversion in leased property are entitled to the same remedies, and are subject to the same obligations contained in the lease, as the original landlord.
In addition to the three points mentioned above, SNDAs often contain other provisions such as those often found in estoppel certificates, requirements that lenders receive notices and extended opportunities to cure defaults, agreements from the tenant with regard to what happens if the lender forecloses or the property is transferred by action in lieu of foreclosure, and requirements that tenants execute certain documents or that they take or not take certain action in the future.
So Who Needs an SNDA?
The lender that takes a lien on real property subject to an existing lease wants an SNDA so that its loan documents will control. It wants the additional provisions described above so that if it takes over the property it will have time to cure any landlord defaults and it will not be subject to claims that the tenant may have against the original landlord, including a claim for the return of the security deposit that the lender may have not received.
The tenant that signs its lease when a mortgage or deed of trust already encumbers the property wants the assurance that if its landlord (the loan borrower) defaults under the loan, the tenant’s lease will not be affected.
The landlord (the loan borrower) does not care about the terms of an SNDA. The SNDA will be effective, by and large, at a time when the borrower has defaulted and has lost its interest in the property. The borrower’s sole interest is that the process in obtaining an SNDA is not costly and will not hold up the loan closing.